Trumpland

Court Hands Trump Huge Blow in E. Jean Carroll Sex Abuse Case

DENIED

The court voted 8-2 in favor of upholding his unsuccessful appeal.

Donald Trump talks to reporters after signing an executive order, "Unleashing prosperity through deregulation," in the Oval Office on January 31, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty

A federal appeals court has rejected President Donald Trump’s request to rehear a jury verdict in favor of E. Jean Carroll.

The decision solidifies a judge’s earlier decision that upheld his liability for sexually abusing and defaming the advice columnist.

On Friday, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan declined to reconsider its Dec. 30 ruling, which affirmed that Trump was responsible for both the sexual assault and resulting defamation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Biden-appointed U.S. Circuit Judge Myrna Pérez said after the 8-2 verdict: “Simply re-litigating a case is not an appropriate use of the en banc procedure.

“In those rare instances in which a case warrants our collective consideration, it is almost always because it involves a question of exceptional importance or a conflict between the panel’s opinion and appellate precedent.”

E. Jean Carroll at the court house.
Carroll is one of several women who have accused Trump of sexual assault or harassment. A federal jury in 2023 found him liable for sexual abuse against Carroll, an advice columnist. Stephanie Keith/Getty Images

The journalist alleged that the then-businessman sexually abused her in a Manhattan department store in the mid-90s. The $5 million award stems from a May 2023 civil verdict in which jurors found Trump had non-consensually touched Carroll and defamed her with his denials. She came forward with her story during Trump’s first term as president.

Trump’s legal team argued the court had wrongly allowed evidence—including the 2005 Access Hollywood tape and testimonies from other women—into the trial.

The two dissenting votes were from Trump-appointed 2nd Circuit judges, Steven Menashi and Michael Park. “The result was a jury verdict based on impermissible character evidence and few reliable facts. No one can have any confidence that the jury would have returned the same verdict if the normal rules of evidence had been applied,” Menashi wrote.

Three other available judges recused from voting without explaining their decision.

E. Jean Carroll (C) departs Manhattan federal appeals court following arguments in a judgement appeal brought by former US President Donald Trump, in New York City, September 6, 2024. Former US President Donald Trump was ordered on January 26, 2024 by a New York jury to pay $83 million in damages to Carroll, whom he publicly insulted and called a liar for alleging that he sexually assaulted her. The jury reached its decision after slightly less than three hours of deliberations. Trump made multiple comments about Carroll while he was president, demeaning her in the wake of her allegation of a 1990s assault. (Photo by Leonardo Munoz / AFP) (Photo by LEONARDO MUNOZ/AFP via Getty Images)
E. Jean Carroll (C) departs Manhattan federal appeals court following arguments in a judgement appeal brought by Trump in September 2024. Leonardo Munoz/AFP via Getty Images

Trump’s team has also appealed a separate $83.3 million defamation judgment from Jan. 2024, and continues to argue that his social media denials are protected by presidential immunity. Trump has denied knowing Carroll and labeled her allegations as fabricated.

The defamation case goes to a three-judge 2nd Circuit panel later this month.

“E. Jean Carroll is very pleased with today’s decision,” Carroll and her attorney said in a joint statement.

“Although President Trump continues to try every possible maneuver to challenge the findings of two separate juries, those efforts have failed. He remains liable for sexual assault and defamation,” they continued.

Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.